On Saturday, 8 October 2016 at 13:06:42 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 7 October 2016 at 18:09, Ethan Watson via Digitalmars-d
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Friday, 7 October 2016 at 01:57:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
Regarding 'Linear.No'... yeah... I dunno. I've had this
argument before. I really hate that pattern. If it's
required, I'll do it
At least as far as readability goes, explicit parameterisation
lets you understand the invocation at a glance rather than
already knowing the actual name of the parameter or having to
go elsewhere in code to see the prototype. For a library, I'd
favor readability.
Oh no, you too? >_<
Incidentally, have you had a geez over the core API? An
efficient API
will emerge when we work out how to work batched operations into
ranges...
I like true/false here :-)
