On 10/20/2016 12:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/20/2016 06:23 AM, Ethan Watson wrote:Suitable enough for simple functions. But beyond that becomes maintenance hell.I agree this workaround has a combinatorial problem.
Yes, Ethan made a good point I hadn't thought of. And any DIP on the matter should cover this point (else it will come up again). These sorts of things are why a DIP should be done - to collect all these points in one place.
