On 21 October 2016 at 06:57, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 12:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > >> On 10/20/2016 06:23 AM, Ethan Watson wrote: >> >>> Suitable enough for simple functions. But beyond that becomes >>> maintenance hell. >>> >> >> I agree this workaround has a combinatorial problem. >> > > Yes, Ethan made a good point I hadn't thought of. Shoot me! ;)
