On Wednesday, December 07, 2016 22:10:57 Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 04:40:02 -0800, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d > > wrote: > > Maybe if warnings were completely standardized, it wouldn't be so bad, > > Warnings that depend on flow analysis will be a problem. You can't write > a compliant compiler unless you implement this level of flow analysis -- > but then it's a problem if any compiler produces better flow analysis!
Well, if the code is unambiguously wrong, and it's just that some compilers catch it and some don't, I'm not sure that that's a big deal, since as soon as one compiler catches it, you know about it, and you fix it, and since it's definitely wrong, there should be no problem with fixing it. But it must be unambiguously bad code, or it definitely is a problem. - Jonathan M Davis
