On 12/14/16 6:11 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:08:56PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 12/14/2016 03:33 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
That's easy to fix:
import { a : b, c; d: e, f; }
The cost being adding new syntax. -- Andrei
Aren't we already adding new syntax?
That's not a Boolean. One may be adding a little or a lot.
On thinking about this again, though, isn't the whole point of this DIP
to add a way of attaching imports X, Y, Z to some declaration such that
the imports are in effect for the scope of the declaration?
That is correct.
The
specific syntax is really secondary.
That is also correct, and thanks for bringing it up; discussion of
syntax eclipse other aspects. I'll make a pass to integrate your points.
Andrei
