On 12/15/2016 6:53 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The document does specify the advantages and disadvantages of lazy
imports, as follows:

===
* Full lazy `import`s. Assume all `import`s are lazy without any change in the
language. That would allow an idiom by which libraries use fully qualified names
everywhere, and the `import`s would be effected only when names are looked up.
This would allow scalability but not the dependency-carrying aspect.
===

That would be a massive breaking change.

Reply via email to