Why? It looks awful. The signatures we already have in Phobos is quite ridiculous, this will not improve. Isn't this and the whole idea of DIP 1005 just a workaround for the compiler not lazily analyzing the symbols.
This.
Re: syntax sugar: std.path::buildPath instead of from!"std.path".buildPath
Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d Tue, 14 Feb 2017 03:02:23 -0800
On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 09:55:51 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
- syntax sugar: std.path::buildPath in... Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path::bui... Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path:... Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.p... Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.p... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path::bui... Chris M via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path:... Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path::bui... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path:... Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path:... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path:... Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path:... Meta via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.path:... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: std.p... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sugar: s... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax sug... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax... Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: syntax... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
