On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 at 17:52:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 at 12:53:42 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
D's arrays are sane, consistent, and logically intuitive even
accounting for the "determinism issue". I've never understood
why this behavior is surprising - it's exactly what I'd
expect. But then I don't program in a way that it's relevant,
so maybe I don't understand how it matters.
It is horrible. It is something you only would expect from a
hacky scripting language. No ifs or buts.
What exactly are we talking about here? The array stomping
protection stuff?
