On 4/7/2017 9:30 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 22:11:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/6/2017 2:18 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
You were asking for a link to deadalnix's original discussion, and
that's the link I found (somebody else also posted a link to the same
discussion).
Only deadalnix can confirm that's what he's talking about.
Yes this: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]
Also this: https://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
Some convenient single page links:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/On_heap_segregation_GC_optimization_and_nogc_relaxing_247498.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/isolated_owned_would_solve_many_problem_we_face_right_now._212165.html
I also produced a fairly detailed spec of how lifetime can be tracked in the
lifetime ML. This address scope and do not require owned by itself. Considering
the compiler infer what it calls "unique" already, it could solve the @nogc
Exception problem to some extent without the owned part. Because it is in a ML,
I cannot post a link.
Please repost it somewhere and a link. It's not very practical to refer to
documents nobody is able to read.
