On Saturday, 8 April 2017 at 20:09:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/7/2017 9:30 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 22:11:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/6/2017 2:18 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
You were asking for a link to deadalnix's original
discussion, and
that's the link I found (somebody else also posted a link to
the same
discussion).
Only deadalnix can confirm that's what he's talking about.
Yes this:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]
Also this:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
Some convenient single page links:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/On_heap_segregation_GC_optimization_and_nogc_relaxing_247498.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/isolated_owned_would_solve_many_problem_we_face_right_now._212165.html
I also produced a fairly detailed spec of how lifetime can be
tracked in the
lifetime ML. This address scope and do not require owned by
itself. Considering
the compiler infer what it calls "unique" already, it could
solve the @nogc
Exception problem to some extent without the owned part.
Because it is in a ML,
I cannot post a link.
Please repost it somewhere and a link. It's not very practical
to refer to documents nobody is able to read.
My dog ate my homework.
deadalnix's a genius of marketing. He has no product, all he
invested was a couple afternoons in newsgroup posts edging on
rants. It's impossible to convert the incomplete ideas that he
throws over the fence into spec and code. But he sells them as
the perfect product. That the posts are incomplete and unclear
helps because whatever problem has a solution in the future. What
amazes me is he still grabs the attention of newbies in the forum.
