On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 14:26:37 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
[...]
The problem with /usr/include/d is that is where .di files
would be located not .d. This would also match up with the
c/c++ usage of it.
When I asked about this a while back, I was told to just install
the sources into the include D as "almost nobody uses .di files
except for proprietary libraries" (and do those even exist?).
But in any case, any path would be fine with me as long as people
can settle on using it - `/usr/share/d` would be available ^^
