On Monday, 17 April 2017 at 15:10:59 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 17 April 2017 at 02:56:00 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Okay, only one container, and happens to be most simple basic one. The others aren't nogc and some of them are even classes. Not only that, Array wasn't @nogc until about a month ago.

No idea what you mean about goal posts. Do you mean it's not an issue worth discussing? You made a false claim, and you still you are still persisting in it as if having a single container be @nogc solves the entire issue.

The first question was whether D had RAII or not. When it was shown that D does have RAII, then the goal posts were moved back to D needing RAII containers that cleaned up their elements on scope exit. When it was shown that D absolutely has RAII containers (that clean up all resources including GC ones on scope exit) then the goal posts were moved back yet again to the containers needed to be @nogc containers. This is despite the fact that @nogc has nothing to do with RAII and is just something people want for convenience.

It has everything to do with @nogc, if it isn't @nogc then it is using the garbage collector and even if it is using Destroy() it is still invoking the GC and something is still going to have to be freed by the GC, even if that class is empty. You can't say it is RAII if it is using the GC, that's just nonsense. So it is not just for convenience.

Not to mention for some reason Array's internal implementation is ref counted. If you want ref counted arrays you should do RefCounted!(Array!T). Std.containers is just a giant mess.

I wasn't part of the other discussion, what the hell is the point of having a discussion if you can't change the subject.

We are now nowhere near the original topic. I'll cut this off at the knees and say If you want @nogc RAII containers that work with std.allocator then just use https://github.com/economicmodeling/containers

I feel like if your solution is, don't use Phobo's containers here use this person's that isn't updating it anymore of questionable quality. Then I feel like you are agreeing with me that phobos containers suck. Oh and it looks like hackerpilot is responsible for merging pull request, lovely.

Reply via email to