On Monday, 17 April 2017 at 22:44:52 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Monday, 17 April 2017 at 21:20:42 UTC, Jerry wrote:
So what happens when the resource outlives the object's
lifetime.
Then RAII rule is violated.
That's exactly what is happening when you are using the
garbage collector.
Correction, that is what *may* happen in some cases when you
are using GC.
Not may, will definitely happen. Even if the destructor is called
the memory is freed, alas the resource isn't freed and is freed
at a later time when the object is destroyed. And as your above
statement says, this violates the RAII rule.
That's exactly the case with the containers in phobos. So
calling them RAII container is just incorrect.
I never said they were.
Then why are you arguing for Jack..
My argument was, from the start, that assessing the *language*
RAII capability has nothing to do with *library* containers or
the (lack of) use of @nogc attribute.
I never replied to you, you replied to me an my argument. I never
said RAII capability has anything to do with, go back and read
the comments and user names. You are confusing me for someone
else it seems.
