On 2017-04-17 21:28, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
The page could also list pre-approved language changes such as async functions (which Walter wants afaik).
Another feature that can be implemented with AST macros. This is starting to get ridicules. So many features have been added and are talked about that can be implemented with AST macros instead. Same as with the scope/safe related DIPs. Many smallish specialized features are added instead of a generic feature that can handle all of them. Increasing the complexity of the language.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
