On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 11:13:35 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no constructor is in the derived class.I think we could even split this up into two separate proposals, because this part of the DIP is fairly non-controversial and could be approved much faster (and implementation-wise it should be fairly simple to support).
<3
