Bill Baxter wrote:
1) Struct literals don't work if you have an opCall for your struct.
(Maybe that's not such a big deal now that structs have
constructors? I haven't had a chance to look into struct constructors
yet...)
Worst case, you can still construct them dynamically.
2) The field:value style struct initializer is probably the closest D
will ever get to named arguments. I think perhaps it should require
the struct name, and be treated as a struct literal rather than static
initializer:
auto anS = S{D:4}; <=> auto anS = S(4)
I think we'd need a compelling use case for why this is needed.
