Bill Baxter wrote:
Here's one thing I just found: struct constructors don't work at compile-time:struct Struct { this(int _n, float _x) { n = _n; x = _x; } int n; float x; } enum A = Struct(1,2); // Error: cannot evaluate ((Struct __ctmp1; // ) , __ctmp1).this(1,2F) at compile time The C-style initializer works. static opCall works too. But if that bug is fixed, then I can't think of a reason to have the classic C-style no-colons syntax.
It isn't a bug. You simply don't need constructors that progressively assign parameters to fields.
Struct(1,2); works just fine without that constructor being defined.
