dsimcha wrote: > == Quote from Denis Koroskin ([email protected])'s article > It would be negligible. The idea is that unions of reference and > non-reference > types are such a corner case that they could be handled conservatively as a > special case, and then it's possible, at least in principle, to deal with the > other 99.99999% of cases precisely and being conservative in 0.00001% of > cases is > really of no practical significance.
Yes, but a moving GC needs to be 100% precise, not 99.99999%. -- Rainer Deyke - [email protected]
