Rainer Deyke wrote: > dsimcha wrote: >> == Quote from Rainer Deyke ([email protected])'s article >>> Yes, but a moving GC needs to be 100% precise, not 99.99999%. >> >> Not if you allow pinning, which we'd need anyhow for untyped, >> conservatively scanned memory blocks. > > If you allow pinning then you no longer get the full benefits of a > moving gc. It would be nice to be able to trade untyped, conservatively > scanned memory blocks for a better gc. > >
Is it possible to allocate 'pinnable' objects from a different heap and still have your normal objects managed by an optimal moving gc?
