On Monday, 29 May 2017 at 19:14:54 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2017 17:19:27 Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d wrote:
`in` is `const scope`

Walter recently changed is that in is now just const, because scope was not properly implemented previously, and folks were using in all over the place, so the odds of code breaking when scope was properly implemented were high.

- Jonathan M Davis

Huh, I missed that... peculiar change. :\ So now it would break for people who did use `in` properly?

In any case, to be clear, I certainly meant `const scope`.

Reply via email to