On Monday, 29 May 2017 at 19:14:54 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2017 17:19:27 Stanislav Blinov via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
`in` is `const scope`
Walter recently changed is that in is now just const, because
scope was not properly implemented previously, and folks were
using in all over the place, so the odds of code breaking when
scope was properly implemented were high.
- Jonathan M Davis
Huh, I missed that... peculiar change. :\ So now it would break
for people who did use `in` properly?
In any case, to be clear, I certainly meant `const scope`.