On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 02:12:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That definition currently there is more precise than the definition on that page has been historically...
Apparently, it is not. Do you have a reference to Walter's change regarding `in` becoming just `const`? Because a change like that should get reflected in the spec, otherwise we might just continue to ignore said spec and expect our grievances to be "gracefully" resolved later. What I mean is I'd rather see/make the change reflected there...
