Re: Why do "const inout" and "const inout shared" exist?

[Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 15:48:26 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] 
wrote:
but can you explain exactly what part of Rust's type system 
provides extra
benefits in terms of optimization over D's type system?

In safe Rust, a reference to mutable data has to be unique [1]. 
So the optimizer could assume no aliasing as long as the mutable 
borrow lasts.

[1] https://rustbyexample.com/scope/borrow/alias.html