On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 at 04:49:29 UTC, Manu wrote:
I've been using code-d for a while, and it generally works well. I've also noticed there's another plugin available, which at the time I first looked, appeared to be older and less-featured than code-d.
dlang-vscode.dlang seems to be more alive at pure minimum. Webfreak his code-d is more up to date and more easy to install. Well, months ago it was my impression.
The issue is sometimes some plugin authors take breaks. And sometimes the latest versions of D break something, making it impossible for the plugins to compile the dependencies. So its better the have choice then.
Is it better to have one plugin where both authors work upon. Yes. Will it happen: Probably not.
