On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 23:27:53 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Might be useful to mention why not included.
This DIP focuses on function (i.e. @-like attributes), the rest
of those attributes are storage classes/visibility classes or
parametric in a way that doesn't fit with this DIP (extern(C++,
A.B), package(foo) align(N).
So then you might make that more clear, such as by re-titling it
"Function Attributes" instead of "Attributes" and change language
in certain locations, like in the abstract, to refer to function
attributions specifically instead of all attributes.
