On Thursday, 17 August 2017 at 13:11:51 UTC, Enamex wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 August 2017 at 14:19:59 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 August 2017 at 21:05:09 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
[...]
There are two thinks of c++ that I miss a little on D:
- Structured binding
- Uniform initialization
But in general, I agreed with you.
Initialization in D is pretty uniform now though. What corners
am I missing?
It's usually:
<type-or-infer> name = <constructor>(args);
Structured bindings... I think C++ did it badly, actually. They
had the {...} syntax fr object construction that worked
everywhere and using the same for deconstruction would've
allowed for quite natural tuples, which manifest almost as
language-level constructs by then (with the help of 'auto' in
template parameters).
Nothing too serious, just miss somethings like:
void add_vec( vec2 a, vec2 b );
add_vec( {10,20}, {20,30} );
