On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 03:55:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I think that Adam has a valid point that there _are_ plenty of
applications that can function just fine as 32-bit, and given
how much easier it is to build for 32-bit on Windows with D, if
you don't need to interact with any 3rd party libraries built
with MS' compiler, then simply using the default 32-bit dmd
stuff on Windows could be just fine.
Yes. I agree. The point was valid, and it was not a point many
would have dared argued .. so good on him ;-)
But progress is needed too.. 64bit is to 32bit, was D is to C.
A new world of possibilites await....
