On 15.11.2017 13:28, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
However, it would be good to prevent the second alias which effectively does nothing.
No. It should just overload properly.
Re: Should aliasing a lambda expression be allowed?
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d Sat, 18 Nov 2017 04:56:08 -0800
- Re: Deprecate impl... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Should aliasing a ... Michael V. Franklin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Andrea Fontana via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Petar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Meta via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Meta via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should aliasin... Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecate impl... Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecate impl... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecate impl... Michael V. Franklin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecate impl... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecate impl... Michael V. Franklin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecate impl... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecate implicit `int` to `bo... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecate implicit `int` t... Temtaime via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecate implicit `in... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
