On Sunday, 31 December 2017 at 09:45:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 16:59:41 UTC, aberba wrote:
Besides, D maturity (which I can't confirm or deny), what else
does D miss to be considered a better alternative for
blockchain in 2018?
You can write blockchain software in any language you want. The
reference implementation for OpenChain seems to be written in
C#.
That's not the point. JavaScript can also be used (technically),
but you don't want to use it (for their use case). Seems you
haven't watched the video so you are speaking out of context.
what else does D miss
I don't think "better" in this context is a technical issue,
more of a cultural one. Well, portability could be an issue.
There is is better when you consider things in context. The talk
was focused on a particular context.
