On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 16:59:41 UTC, aberba wrote:
In this video[1] from 2016, developer talks about C++ memory
safety features, meta-programming, maturity and few others as
main reasons they choose it for developing their blockchain
software (the way I got it from a quick view).
Besides, D maturity (which I can't confirm or deny), what else
does D miss to be considered a better alternative for
blockchain in 2018?
D is also more productive, has safety and unittest built-in.
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4jq4frE5v4
We can have a full implementation of bitcoin protocol in D, if
anyone is interested we can start it..
