On Thursday, 18 January 2018 at 03:19:57 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 14 January 2018 at 23:03:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks for these thoughts!
* (u)cent support
* fixes for the shared qualifier
* ownership mechanism
These took less than 1h to add support for? That would be
awesome... but realistically only the (u)cent sounds like that
size of effort.
Agreed. That would be already a plus, as it would allow to do
all the crypto in D.
Reading this again, I think there is a bit of a misunderstanding.
Only cent/ucent took me ~1h to implement. The rest is more
complex. That being said, having cent/ucent would unlock a great
deal of performance for crypto libraries, and this is where the
bottleneck is as far as CPU is concerned in this type of
application.
