On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 02:46:03 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > There's been some discussion about what to do with issues that propose > enhancements like this. We want to make them available and searchable > just in case someone working on a related proposal is looking for > precedent and inspiration. > > I was thinking of closing with REMIND or LATER.
If you're specifically talking about enhancements that would require a DIP, calling it "DIP needed" (or similar) is clear that work is needed to get it in, rather than just some "we'll look at this at some point" kind of label. > Seb is experimenting > with moving the entire bug database to github issues, which may offer us > more options for classification. You'd get fewer classification options, though they may be easier to work with effectively; sometimes simpler is better...
