On 1/18/18 7:17 AM, rjframe wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 02:46:03 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There's been some discussion about what to do with issues that propose
enhancements like this. We want to make them available and searchable
just in case someone working on a related proposal is looking for
precedent and inspiration.
I was thinking of closing with REMIND or LATER.
If you're specifically talking about enhancements that would require a
DIP, calling it "DIP needed" (or similar) is clear that work is needed to
get it in, rather than just some "we'll look at this at some point" kind
of label.
I put a "DIP needed" mention in text and closed the issue with REMIND. I
suggest similar treatment for similar issues. -- Andrei
