On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 20:01:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
As Andrei wrote in TDPL, (and I paraphrase,) it sucks when built-in types have magical abilities inaccessible to user code. This is a common defect in many programming languages... the "magical" behaviour is wonderful when it works. But if you need something that said "magic" doesn't cover, you're left up the creek without a paddle. In D, however, you're given the tools to build your own equivalents of language built-ins.

Not true for implicit construction of a user-defined type. So you can't have a `struct Pointer` wrap a pointer fully because you can't pass null to a function taking a Pointer. You can't do the same for Algebraic element types, they're not Algebraic. In C++ you can, but it's by default, so you get implicit construction even when the *type author* didn't intend it to work.

Reply via email to