On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 18:04:07 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 12/03/18 16:31, Simen Kjærås wrote:
The main idea behind rvalue types and their name, is that they
are types that can only ever be rvalues, not by convention,
but through the type system.
How do you prevent creating a named instance of them using
either auto or ReturnType!func ?
You create a new language feature that explicitly forbids this.
I'm not saying this is possible in the language now, I'm saying
it's a thought that I've entertained for a while and wonder if it
would be a reasonable addition to the language.
--
Simen
