On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 14:13:02 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 13:02:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 12:23:23 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
[...]
Good point. Would matrix(j, i) syntax solve this issue? One of
reasons to introduce Mat is API simplicity. ndslice has 3
compile time params. I hope we would have only type for Mat,
like Mat!double.
I'm not sure I understand what your syntax solution does...
matrix(j, i) == matrix[i, j] (reversed order)
But I agree that there is a benefit from API simplicity. It
would probably be easier to just say Mat is row-major and have
another that is column-major (or have the options in ndslice).
Nevertheless, it can't help to look at what other matrix
libraries do.
Eigen's (C++ library) Matrix class uses template arguments to
set storage order (_Options). It looks like Eigen has six
template arguments.
https://eigen.tuxfamily.org/dox/classEigen_1_1Matrix.html
Interesting. Maybe user can do:
alias Mat = Matrix!(double, ColMajor);
Fixed lengths can be considered too. Eigen has good ideas.
