== Quote from KennyTM~ ([email protected])'s article > On Dec 7, 09 01:24, bearophile wrote: > > Andrei Alexandrescu: > >> Should we yank operator>>>? > > > > We can change it purpose and add the other one: > > <<< rotate left > >>>> rotate right > > > > Bye, > > bearophile > No, it will _silently_ break code that uses >>> as unsigned right shift.
Well, we could get around this by making >>> an error for a few releases, and then only after everyone's removed their >>>s that mean unsigned shift, we could drop in the rotate semantics.
