Walter Bright Wrote: > dsimcha wrote: > > == Quote from KennyTM~ ([email protected])'s article > >> No, it will _silently_ break code that uses >>> as unsigned right shift. > > > > Well, we could get around this by making >>> an error for a few releases, > > and then > > only after everyone's removed their >>>s that mean unsigned shift, we could > > drop > > in the rotate semantics. > > It'll still silently break code moving from D1 to D2.
Well, I could see the value of poviding a rotate operator. Since >>> is tainted, what about >>@ and <<@ for integral rotation? Jerry
