Re: Feature to get or add value to an associative array.

[Giles Bathgate via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 20 April 2018 at 02:12:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Out of all of those, I _really_ hope that you don't go with 
require. It sounds like the sort of thing that you'd get in a 
library having to do with unit testing or contracts and gives 
no indication whatsoever as to what it does.

Yes I know. I gave up on trying to find a single verb or 
runTogetherWords that would describe exactly what it does, and 
instead opted for something that I like, and added documentation 
to describe what it does.

I don't think I will find a name that everybody likes. But I am 
open to more suggestions as its probably the easiest aspect of 
the PR to change.