On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 23:54 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars- d wrote: > On 05/01/2018 10:51 PM, TheDalaiLama wrote: > > > > There's no substituion for taste...some have it.. some don't. > > > > 'Experience' is irrelevant. > > > > Honestly, there's a lot of truth to this. People can certainly learn, of > course (well, at least some people can), but experience definitely does > not imply learning has actually occurred. > > Contrary to popular belief (especially common HR belief), experience is > NOT a consistent, commoditized thing. There's such a thing as quality of > experience, and that has far more impact than quantity.
Agreed that hours claimed as experience is not a measure of knowledge. But conversely experience with learning is critical to future development. Thus statements such as "experience is irrelevant" are dangerous statements in most contexts. -- Russel. ========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
