On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 05:10:08 UTC, Uknown wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 04:43:09 UTC, KingJoffrey wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 03:32:25 UTC, Uknown wrote:
`private` is for outside the module. Within the module,
private is not applied because D wanted to avoid C++'s
`friend` functions.
'private' is "meant" to be part of the implementation of 'the
class'.
Whereas D makes it part of the implementation of 'the module'
( which is an even higher level of abstraction).
This is an abomination!
A class should have the capacity to protect its
attributes/methods - even from the module.
Let's not start this discussion again
https://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
My point is, that adding sealed or anything else to classes, is a
waste of time, cause a class is D, is not really a class at all.
A class in D, is some unprinciple pseudo-class, that cannot truly
encapsulate itself any longer.
