On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 05:26:36 UTC, Apocalypto wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 05:10:08 UTC, Uknown wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 04:43:09 UTC, KingJoffrey wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 03:32:25 UTC, Uknown wrote:
Whereas D makes it part of the implementation of 'the module'
( which is an even higher level of abstraction).
This is an abomination!
A class should have the capacity to protect its
attributes/methods - even from the module.
Let's not start this discussion again
https://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
If an encapsulation problem is highlighted again and again, may
be it's time to acknowledge at least that there is a problem.
It's a problem to you, but not to me and I'm sure many others in
the D community can agree that private being module level has a
lot of benefits over private being "class-level".
