On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 06:05:31 UTC, KingJoffrey wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 05:59:17 UTC, Tobias Müller wrote:
KingJoffrey <[email protected]> wrote:
The problem is not so much D, but that C++/Java/C#
programmers, and many from other languages (Go, Rust....)
will expect private to mean private...not private..depending
on....
Well, that's not entirely true.
Visibility in Rust is similar to D.
There's no one true language semantics that holds for all
languages. That's
the point of having different languages.
actually, private is default in Rust.
public is default in D.
also, in Rust, private is private within the module, *and* its
descendants.
I don't believe that is the case in D (someone correct me if
I'm wrong)
`public` by default is again not a problem. Just apply `private`
as necessary. Also, if you want the rust style `private`, D
offers `package`, which means private to the modules contained by
a package.
