On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 09:35:29 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote: > ([*] I was going to suggest including dmd-nightly as well, but that > poses the problem of load: running it every night will cause a lot of CI > churn, which also generates a lot of mostly-useless information -- no > one will care about which of 50 dmd git revisions failed / succeeded to > compile a package, just whether the *latest* dmd-nightly works. So > perhaps an update once a week or once a month in between releases will > be enough. But dmd-nightly is an optional extra that can be skipped for > now. The important baseline is the current official releases of gdc / > ldc / dmd.)
The beta might be better than dmd-nightly, as they would avoid the churn and still provide maintainers with time to react to problems with the upcoming release before the release is out.
