Nick B wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think we are now in the position of defining a solid set of
concurrency primitives for D. This follows many months of mulling over
models and options.
[snip]
That's why I'm thinking of creating a mailing list or maybe another
group for this. Any ideas on what would be the best approach? I also
want to gauge interest from threading experts who'd like to
participate. Please advise: (a) whether you would like to participate
to the design; (b) keep discussions on the general group; (c) create a
separate newsgroup; (d) create a mailing list. The latter would have
open enrollment.
Andrei
Andrei
Will you be inviting Bartosz to participate, or have you already has
discussions with him ? He has written a number of blogs around this issue.
Nick B
I'm not sure about Bartosz' and Walter's thoughts. I personally think
that past experience suggests that collaboration would be difficult. No
less than three attempts to work together on threads ranging from design
to implementation have failed, in spite of everybody's best intentions.
Andrei
