Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Nick B wrote:
3. Finally, is this a requirement to be finished for your book,
or is this a separate issue ?
If TDPL comes without addressing concurrency, or if if comes with
something, ahem, not-so-good a la Python, we may as well gather our
toys and go home.
The way things are going, I can't see things turning out any other
way. Everything involving concurrency/shared seems to get pushed off.
We already have a compelling message-passing model designed and to a
large extent implemented by Sean Kelly, so you can discount that risk.
This thread is a recent example: asking for participants and then
having no meaningful follow-up. When I was part of the sausage-making
emails you and Walter were nearly silent, even in response to
messages such as "can we at least agree to X?"
There are a few clerical issue to take care of, and I'm not sure what
Walter's preferred method of communication is. I will make you part of
whatever transport we'll use.
I am sure that some questions weren't answered simply because there was
no clear answer. Besides, email communication is imperfect.
Andrei
