Rainer Deyke wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> This is the third time I'm asking: what is a list of allegedly silly
>> names in phobos? Far as I can tell the case against "retro" and "iota"
>> is rather tenuous. So what are others? readText? topN? setDifference?
>> Talk to me.
>
> "retro" is unusual, but at least I know what it means. I may not like
> it, but I can use it.
>
> "iota" is horrible. The last ten times I saw "iota", it was a typo of
> "itoa". Like all Greek letters, 'ι' is used as a shorthand for all
> kinds of different meanings in different fields of science and
> mathematics. It's a useful shorthand because it's a single letter.
> Spelling it out as "iota" wastes space without disambiguating between
> all the different possible meanings of 'ι'.
>
> If you're going to go for a single-letter name, "i" is better than
> "iota". It's just as arbitrary, it's just as ambiguous, I have just as
> little idea what it means, but it's shorter to write, and you don't need
> to know the English names of Greek letters to recognize it.
>
Plus, "iota" doesn't mean what it does. According to the dictionary
(Collins Cobuild): "An *iota* of something is an extremely small
amount of it. EG I don't feel one iota of guilt... The buyer would
not go one iota higher... You know, I don't think you've changed an
iota." What's the relation with stepping through a range at fixed
intervals? A much better name would be "step": it's the same length
and it says exactly what it means.
Jerome
--
mailto:[email protected]
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
