Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > "iota" is already present with the same semantics in 1.25 languages: C++ > and Go.
I've never used or encountered it in C++. Either it's useless (in which case it should be dropped), or its name keeps it from being used. > Anyhow, what's a better name? Since I still don't know what it does, I can't answer that question. -- Rainer Deyke - [email protected]
