On 26/05/2010 23:59, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't think it will be analogous to a Tango/Phobos separation. Dcollections
supports ranges, and the major interface to Andrei's containers is ranges, and
if my implementations are accepted, both will probably even be using the same
underlying implementations. So I think the two libs will quite happily exist
together. I am disappointed that dcollections wasn't chosen, but given the
eventual API that Andrei has come up with, I think it didn't really have a shot
from the beginning.
I have not yet seen a statement regarding the replacement (hopefully hot
swapped) feature of underlaying data structures
dCollections has support, std.collection... dunno
In case that Andrei decides to ignore that feature I can't see how
Dcollections and std.collection will harmonize.
bjoern