On 26/05/2010 23:59, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't think it will be analogous to a Tango/Phobos separation.  Dcollections 
supports ranges, and the major interface to Andrei's containers is ranges, and 
if my implementations are accepted, both will probably even be using the same 
underlying implementations.  So I think the two libs will quite happily exist 
together.  I am disappointed that dcollections wasn't chosen, but given the 
eventual API that Andrei has come up with, I think it didn't really have a shot 
from the beginning.

I have not yet seen a statement regarding the replacement (hopefully hot swapped) feature of underlaying data structures

dCollections has support, std.collection... dunno

In case that Andrei decides to ignore that feature I can't see how Dcollections and std.collection will harmonize.

bjoern

Reply via email to