On 26/05/2010 01:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can probably submit my basic implementations, and use them from std.x
to implement dcollections. This way, the complex pieces are shared.
Dcollections definitely fills needs that this collection package
doesn't, and it should be mostly compatible.
-Steve
Not that I like the idea of having (once again) two libs instead of one,
but I am convinced that the separation between
core data- structures, say xxTree, xxList, xxNode etc.
and the final implementation f.i. Set, Dictionary/Map.
is a very good thing.
std.structures std.algorithm std.container/collection
--
Next, what's wrong with simple collections, stack, queue etc. Guess too
simple for u guys ;)
--
I regret a bit that you haven't picked up the idea of collection events.
IMHO this is the smartest way to implement a UnDo/ReDo Stack or to
create a MultiSet based on a simple Set.
Bjoern
