bearophile <[email protected]> wrote:
Simen kjaeraas:
I think you have missed one important point: that was not my list of
things I'd like in D2/D3. It contains some cute things, but it's first
of all a summary of the linked stackoverflow thread. My personal list of
desiderata for D3 is different.
You are right indeed. I misread that first sentence to its exact
opposite. :p
I think Walter said this can't be implemented :)
I think Walter just doesn't want to implement it. :p
The items alignment of function arguments used by D tuples is not
fitting to return a struct.
Yeah. So, either we need thunks for this, or tuples need to carry
alignment information.
Neat. Worthy an @keyword, I think. "@flag enum foo {...}"
It's cute. But Don hates attributes :-) Recently I have created a thread
about this, and some one has written a good enough implementation in
normal D code, that can be "good enough".
Screw Don. :p
In all seriousness though, the implementation in that thread is good
enough for me, and with the language change Andrei mentioned in the same
thread, I would be a happy panda.
--
Simen
